In January, the Second District Court of Appeal issued its opinion about the validity of the property deed restrictions and the propriety of the 2012 sale of parkland in Palos Verdes Estates. The Palos Verdes Homes Association filed a Petition for Rehearing asking the same three appellate justices who decided the case to change their mind. Today that request for a rehearing was denied. In addition, the Court of Appeal strengthened its earlier decision by adding the following footnote to the opinion on the validity of the deeds:
The Association argues that it had the right to transfer the parkland to the Luglianis because this original declaration was never properly amended. But, the Chairman of the Association’s board expressly consented to the terms of the 1940 deed. By expressly agreeing to those terms, the Association cannot now argue that Bank of America had no power to include them.
The Daily Breeze reports here on the going legal dispute over the quorum for board elections for the Palos Verdes Homes Association:
The next hearing is set for Feb. 15, where Jeff Lewis, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he will ask the judge to lower the threshold for a quorum. A quorum hasn’t been reached since 2009. In 2017’s election, just 1,589 votes were cast.
From Today’s Daily Breeze:
A Superior Court judge has ruled that the Palos Verdes Peninsula school board twice violated California’s open meetings law in 2016 as it was putting an end to an agreement to install solar panels in district schools.
Torrance Superior Court Judge William Fahey, in a tentative ruling Sept. 5 that likely will stand, sided with a group of residents who sued the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District Board of Education for alleged violations of the Brown Act.
The prevailing parties were represented by Jeff Lewis.
The Daily Breeze reported about the lawsuit filed by Jeff Lewis to challenge an illegal sale of parkland in Palos Verdes Estates.
Hammes Company Healthcare, LLC v. Tri-City Healthcare District, 801 F.Supp.2d 1023 (S.D. Cal. 2011). Mr. Lewis represented a Southern California hospital that hired Hammes Company Healthcare to build a medical office building. The project failed, and in the ensuing litigation, Hammes sought $20 million and asserted five claims against the hospital, its CEO and its director of business affairs for breach of contract, fraud and promissory estoppel. Mr. Lewis moved for summary judgment and prevailed as to 5 of the 6 claims. Following summary judgment in 2011, Mr. Lewis obtained a defense judgment at trial of the one remaining claim in January 2013.
In December 2011, a voter filed a lawsuit against a local healthcare district alleging that his Equal Protection rights were violated by the district’s handling of certain board member meetings. The case was Page v. Tri-City Healthcare District, 860 F.Supp.2d 1154 (S.D. Cal. 2012). Mr. Lewis defeated the equal protection claim.
In September 2010, Mr. Lewis filed a challenge to ballot language in the November 2010 election in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. Mr. Lewis contended that the ballot proponent included “false and misleading” arguments. Mr. Lewis prevailed, obtained injunctive relief and the rebuttal argument was ordered revised to exclude the misleading statement. Lewis v. Logan, (Sept. 8, 2010, BS128266). The Daily News published this article about the lawsuit.